摘   要：目的  探討我科室超敏CRP檢測(cè)系統(tǒng)室間質(zhì)評(píng)偏倚較大的原因及對(duì)策。方法  將衛(wèi)生部臨檢中心室間質(zhì)評(píng)成績(jī)回報(bào)主頁中超敏CRP的臨檢中心數(shù)據(jù)按方法、試劑、校準(zhǔn)物及EQA分組統(tǒng)計(jì)后，分別觀察5個(gè)EQA樣品在各組中的中位數(shù)，并與我科室檢測(cè)系統(tǒng)所屬組的中位數(shù)進(jìn)行比較，并以重新分組后的中位數(shù)為靶值，分別計(jì)算我科室EQA網(wǎng)絡(luò)回報(bào)結(jié)果和凍存樣品復(fù)測(cè)結(jié)果與此靶值的bias%和正確度。結(jié)果  EQA網(wǎng)絡(luò)回報(bào)結(jié)果與凍存樣品復(fù)測(cè)的結(jié)果一致，以試劑和校準(zhǔn)物生產(chǎn)廠家進(jìn)行分組時(shí)，兩次檢測(cè)結(jié)果與中位數(shù)的bias%均<1/3TEa，正確度驗(yàn)證通過;而以方法和EQA分組方法分組時(shí)bias%則明顯增高，雖然均1/2TEa，正確度驗(yàn)證未通過。結(jié)論  超敏CRP室間質(zhì)評(píng)時(shí)以儀器進(jìn)行分組計(jì)算靶值的方式可能不適當(dāng)，建議按試劑廠家進(jìn)行分組或以參考方法對(duì)EQA樣品賦值后進(jìn)行偏倚的評(píng)估，以正確指導(dǎo)臨床實(shí)驗(yàn)室進(jìn)行質(zhì)量改進(jìn);同時(shí)，試劑廠家應(yīng)加強(qiáng)校準(zhǔn)品的溯源性及互通性，且校準(zhǔn)品的濃度應(yīng)包含不同醫(yī)學(xué)決定水平處的濃度。
　　關(guān)鍵詞：超敏CRP;室間質(zhì)評(píng);偏倚
　　中圖分類號(hào)：R446.1                                   文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A                               DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.05.028
　　文章編號(hào)：1006-1959（2018）05-0087-04
　　Analysis of the Reasons and Countermeasures for the Bias of Ventricular Quality Evaluation in Hypersensitive CRP
　　LUO Ying-jie，LIU Yan-ting，XIAO Guang-jun
　�。―epartment of Laboratory，Suining Central Hospital，Suining 629000，Sichuan，China）
　　Abstract：Objective  To explore the causes and countermeasures of the bias of the room quality evaluation in the hypersensitive CRP detection system in our department.Methods  The Ministry of health clinical center of clinical laboratory data results in return home HS CRP inspection center EQA according to statistical method，reagents，calibrators and EQA packet，5 EQA samples were observed in each group of the median，and compared with the median of our department detection system belongs to the group，and median again after grouping as the target value were calculated in our department EQA network return results and frozen sample survey results and the target value and accuracy of bias%.Results  EQA network returns with the results of frozen sample survey，grouped by the reagent and calibrator manufacturer，the two test results with a median of bias%<1/3TEa，the accuracy is verified by the method;and EQA packet bias% grouping method was significantly increased，although the<TEa，there still are 3 or more samples of bias%>1/2TEa， accuracy verification failed.Conclusion  It may not be appropriate to use instruments to calculate the target values in the room quality assessment of hypersensitive CRP.It is suggested that the bias of EQA samples should be evaluated by the group of reagent manufacturers or by reference method.At the same time，the traceability and interoperability of calibration products should be strengthened by reagent manufacturers，and the concentration of calibration products should include the concentration of different medical decision levels.

相關(guān)熱詞搜索：對(duì)策 較大 原因 間質(zhì) 分析